吃瓜黑料网

吃瓜黑料网
Skip to main content

Facility Condition Index (FCI)

The Facility Condition Index (FCI) rating is a measurement of the condition of a school building. The 吃瓜黑料网 (吃瓜黑料网) publishes the FCI rating for each of its schools on an annual basis, consistent with its commitment to increase transparency and accountability. The data corresponds to the 2023听calendar year. The health and safety of students, staff and community members is our top priority when planning school repairs. Our Facility Services staff works year-round to ensure our schools are safe regardless of their FCI rating.

听

The FCI rating does not reflect on the safety of a school building.

Key Facts:

  • Almost half of 吃瓜黑料网 school buildings were built more than 60 years ago.
  • Our renewal needs backlog was approximately $4.2听billion as of March听2023听and continues to rise.
  • On May 2, 2019, the Ontario government introduced Bill 108 鈥淢ore Homes, More Choice Act, 2019鈥�, which includes amendments to the Education Development Charges (EDCs) section of the Education Act. However, the proposed changes won鈥檛 benefit the 吃瓜黑料网 as it does not qualify for EDCs.
  • Older schools often have a higher FCI rating as some building components such as walls, lights and ventilation systems may require major repairs or replacement.
  • Unlike other Ontario school boards, the 吃瓜黑料网 does not qualify for Educational Development Charges (EDCs) because there is surplus space across the system, which puts the 吃瓜黑料网 at a disadvantage.
  • The 吃瓜黑料网 keeps advocating for the Ontario Government to amend the Education Development Charges (EDCs) regulation (Ontario Reg. 20/98) to allow the 吃瓜黑料网 to collect EDCs to help support urgent school infrastructure needs and reduce overcrowding in high-growth areas of the city.
  • The 吃瓜黑料网 brought a legal challenge to access EDCs, which was heard by the court March 2021. The Ontario government was supported by BILD, an association of land developers in Ontario, an Intervenor in the case. 吃瓜黑料网 is disappointed with the Divisional Court鈥檚 decision to uphold the government鈥檚 right to deny the 吃瓜黑料网 access to development charges. The 吃瓜黑料网 is reviewing the decision and will be considering an appeal. 吃瓜黑料网 Chair Alexander Brown said the Board will continue to use all means at its disposal to advocate for 吃瓜黑料网鈥檚 fair access to EDCs.
  • Learn more about the听 Renewal Needs Backlog 听(RNB) and听 Education Development Charges 听(EDCs).

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the Facility Condition Index (FCI)?

The Facility Condition Index (FCI) rating is a measurement of the condition of a school building expressed as a percentage. It is obtained by dividing the amount of a school’s renewal backlog by the school’s total Asset Replacement Value (ARV).
 

2. What is the Asset Replacement Value of a building?

The Ministry of Education has a standard formula to determine how much space is required per student. This formula doesn’t include all the features that exist in a number of older 吃瓜黑料网 schools. The ARV is the cost needed to completely rebuild a new school to accommodate the same number of students using the Ministry standards. In other words, the ARV is proportionate to the number of students in a school. However, some of the features in the existing school might not be included in the new school. For example, if the existing school has a swimming pool, the new school would not have a swimming pool.
 

3. Why is the FCI from the 吃瓜黑料网 and Ministry of Education different?

The Ministry hires external consultants to inspect each school every five years and provides the 吃瓜黑料网 with updated information. This is equivalent to 20 per cent of our schools. While the Ministry’s FCI is based on anticipated renewal needs for the next five years starting at the time of the assessment, the 吃瓜黑料网 (吃瓜黑料网) data is based on one year, and includes repairs done during the year. Learn more about the 
 

4. The FCI of my school is over 100%. How can that be?

Since the 吃瓜黑料网 has a large number of older buildings, it has unique spaces in its schools such as wide corridors, larger room sizes, parenting centres, lunchrooms, child care facilities, swimming pools and auditoriums, which are outside the scope of the Ministry鈥檚 Area Benchmark or ARV. Although some of the renewal backlog might be related to these spaces, the cost of the replacement school does not include these spaces or features in its design. This results in a lower ARV and subsequently a higher FCI.

Although the formula that the Ministry uses in calculating the ARV is applicable to most situations, there are instances where it results in a very low ARV. For example, the number of students in special education classrooms is lower than in regular classrooms. Therefore, since the ARV is based on the number of students, it will be lower in schools that have many special education classes, leading to an artificially higher FCI. In addition, it costs more to replace individual building components when they have failed as opposed to doing it when building a new school. When a new school is built for example, the boiler can be put in place before certain walls of the building are built. When that boiler needs to be replaced in an existing school, it could require sections of the school鈥檚 walls to be removed and then rebuilt in order to have the appropriate space to put the boiler in place.

5. Is my school safe while the FCI is high?

The FCI rating does not reflect on the safety of a school building. A high FCI can be attributed to the age of building components and excessive spaces over the Ministry鈥檚 standard. Proper maintenance of aged building components will extend their life cycle without compromising safety. Building components that cannot be repaired are replaced with new ones. Our staff works year-round to make sure that the schools are safe regardless of their FCI value. The health and safety of students and staff is considered a top priority in planning school repairs.

6. Does the FCI determine where the renewal funding should be spent?

Ideally, the FCI would drive renewal spending. However, that is not the case with our schools because of the large renewal backlog we have in place. We assign the highest priority to the repair or replacement of components related to health and safety of the building users. The prioritization of renewal projects is based on the condition of building components. Whenever possible, we repair or replace portions of building components to extend their life cycle. If they cannot be repaired, we replace them with new ones.